<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=2797612&amp;fmt=gif">

According to Alloy's Annual State of Fraud Benchmark Report, 91% of respondents say that fraud rates have increased at their organization year-over-year. To stay ahead of sophisticated fraudsters, there is a growing need to break down data-siloes to identify industry-wide patterns and trends. This blog post highlights how analyzing diverse data sources can help us better understand financial fraud patterns and develop more effective countermeasures. 

What are some example sources of financial fraud data that can be analyzed? 

Financial fraud data can come from various sources, such as publicly available datasets, financial institutions, third-party providers, dark web data, social media, fraud detection software, regulatory bodies, news and media reports, court records, academic research institutions, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Combining these sources can provide a comprehensive view of the financial fraud landscape and help develop better detection and prevention strategies. 

How can we identify patterns of fraud within these diverse datasets? 

Machine learning techniques, such as supervised and unsupervised learning, ensemble methods, semi-supervised learning, deep learning, reinforcement learning, graph-based techniques, natural language processing (NLP), and transfer learning, can enhance fraud detection capabilities and identify patterns, trends, and anomalies in financial data. 

What are example patterns and types of financial fraud that can be detected across multiple data sources? 

1. Credit Card Fraud:

  • Unusual spending patterns, such as sudden spikes in transaction amounts or frequency
  • Multiple transactions made in a short period or across different geographical locations
  • Transactions made from unrecognized devices or IP addresses
  • Repeated failed attempts to authorize a transaction 

2. Identity Theft:

  • Multiple accounts or loans opened in a short time span using the same personal information 
  • Unusual changes in account information, such as address or email 
  • Account takeover attempts, like unauthorized password resets or security question changes 
  • Suspicious inquiries on credit reports 

3. Account Takeover:

  • Multiple failed login attempts or password reset requests 
  • Sudden changes in account details, such as email, phone number, or mailing address 
  • Unusual transactions or transfer requests soon after changes in account details 
  • Login attempts from unfamiliar devices or locations 

4. Insider Fraud:

  • Transactions or activities conducted by employees outside of their regular job responsibilities 
  • Unusual access to sensitive information or systems by employees 
  • Suspicious communication between employees and external parties 
  • Consistent overriding of internal controls or policies 

5. Mortgage Fraud:

  • Inflated property values in appraisal reports 
  • Unusual income-to-debt ratios or credit scores for loan applicants 
  • Falsified employment or income information in loan applications 
  • Inconsistencies in property titles or ownership records 

6. Phishing and Social Engineering:

  • Repeated use of similar email templates or phishing websites 
  • Common patterns in email sender addresses or domain names 
  • Similarities in communication strategies, such as urgency or requests for personal information 
  • Consistent use of specific social engineering tactics, like pretending to be a trusted entity 

7. Money Laundering:

  • Complex, layered transactions designed to obscure the source of funds 
  • Unusually large cash deposits or withdrawals 
  • Transactions involving high-risk jurisdictions or shell companies 
  • Inconsistent transaction patterns compared to the customer's profile or expected activity 

8. Investment Scams:

  • Common themes or promises in fraudulent investment offerings, such as high returns with low risk 
  • Repeated use of specific communication channels, like unsolicited emails or social media messages 
  • Similarities in the structure or setup of fraudulent investment schemes 
  • Inconsistencies in the information provided by the promoters of the investment 

9. Synthetic Identity Fraud:

  • Use of partially or entirely fabricated personal information to create new identities 
  • Inconsistencies in personal data, such as mismatched dates of birth, addresses, or Social Security numbers 
  • Multiple accounts or loans associated with similar or slightly altered personal information 
  • Unusual credit report inquiries or credit activity patterns associated with synthetic identities 

Data-driven insights can combat financial fraud through enhanced fraud prevention, improved detection and monitoring, better resource allocation, predictive analytics, fraud scoring models, network analysis, customer segmentation, employee training and awareness, collaboration and information sharing, customer education, and continuous improvement. 

By analyzing industry-wide data sources and embracing data-driven approaches, organizations can enhance their strategies to detect, prevent, and dismantle fraudulent activities, leading to improved detection rates, reduced financial losses, and increased customer trust. 

Join us on May 3rd as we provide a deep dive into first and third-party synthetic identity fraud patterns and how they can be used to uncover fraud rings.

You may also like

Combating Cyber & Fraud with FiVerity
Combating Cyber & Fraud with FiVerity
7 December, 2021

Combating Cyber & Fraud with FiVerity What is FiVerity? FiVerity provides financial institutions with cyber fraud de...

Fighting a Shared Threat: Fraud & Security Merges in Banks and FinServ
Fighting a Shared Threat: Fraud & Security Merges in Banks and FinServ
29 March, 2021

Separating anti-fraud and cyber-sec activities in independent operating groups within credit unions, banks and other fin...

The Cybersecurity Landscape is Changing Rapidly
The Cybersecurity Landscape is Changing Rapidly
8 February, 2021

Financial Institutions Need Technology Partners in the Changing Cybersecurity Landscape